MEDIOCREMOVIE.CLUB
  • Reviews
  • Side Pieces
  • Shane of Thrones
  • Podcast
  • About
  • Archives
  • Game of Thrones Fantasy

Electoral Dysfunction

2/24/2014

0 Comments

 

2.00
C

"I think the doc is more aimed at people who didn't learn anything in grade school and high school"
"Children are dumb and don't know anything."
"I got the feeling throughout that this was something that high school football coaches could show their history/government classes in lieu of actually teaching."
Well, how was that first documentary?  If all else fails, most of us can agree it is better than Only God Forgives.

Anyway, when I first heard of this, I could hardly wait to see it.  It had nothing to do with Mo Rocca or that Indiana was involved in it.  Rather, it had everything to do with the topic.  The discussion of the Electoral College (E.C.) is important and interesting yet incredibly frustrating because adults know very little about it or what it does.  With that being stated, Electoral Dysfunction did a fairly good job of illustrating its working.

I particularly liked how Rocca used an elementary class to simulate the workings of the E.C.  That was creative, effective, and accurate.  The result was convenient where most of the students picked one and the "electoral college" chose the winner, which was the other option.  I say it was convenient because it illustrated what Rocca and the film wanted - the E.C. misrepresents the will of the people.  Well, that is not entirely true.  More on that later.

Another informational aspect of the film is the ease of someone becoming an elector.  Like the film suggested, it is incredibly easy for anyone to become a state elector.  The only thing that is required is party identification and paper work.  That is all.  If more people knew that, more people would want to be an elector, which could lead to faithless electors - people who claim to vote for a candidate but votes for the other guy.

Any time Indiana is mentioned in any kind of media, my initial reaction is to cringe.  I am paranoid Hollywood or any independent filmmaker will poke fun of my beloved home state.  When I saw Rocca going to Indiana, I feared for the worst.  Honestly, I was pleasantly surprised.  I was happy to see something meaningful from Indiana as opposed to Rocca pulling a Bill Maher in Religulous.  

Now, Electoral Dysfunction is biased against the E.C., toward the popular vote, and against voter ID laws.  Essentially, it chronicles the politicization of voting.  Indiana is chosen not because it was a "swing state" in 2008 but because at the time it had stringent voter ID laws.  Rocca wanted to see how the McCain/Palin and Obama/Biden people handled the situation.  What Rocca found was exactly for what he looked; the right to vote turned to a political viewpoint.  The issue of Mike Marshall highlights that.

I disagree with the film's thesis on the E.C.  There have only been four instances in American history where the E.C. winner and the popular vote winner did not match up. That was in 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000.  Since 1824 - the first election where the popular vote was recorded - it had four hiccups.  That is a stable system.

Also, the popular vote will not be as representative as Electoral Dysfunction claimed.  It makes it sound like participation will skyrocket and will be pure.  That is incorrect.  The focus will no longer be on states but the most populated cities.  Furthermore if people want less money in politics, the popular vote method is not the way to go.  That method will make people more sick of politics than they are currently.

I will write more in my second round but all in all, Electoral Dysfunction was pretty good.  It is not an "A" movie but a "B/B-" is fairly accurate.  Grade: B-

Sara, what did you think?
0 Comments

Only god forgives

2/14/2014

0 Comments

 

0.93
D

"Excitement pretty quickly melted into disappointment""
"So many long hallways to walk down."
"Did I mention I'm going to Thailand this summer - remind me not to get involved in a boxing ring or drug dealing."

So, that was…something?

Cool is in the ballpark with funny.  If I think something’s cool, it’s difficult to communicate why I think so.  I thought Drive, Nicholas Winding-Refn’s movie before Only God Forgives, was incredibly cool.  Ryan Gosling’s gloves and jacket, Albert Brooks’s razor collection, the soundtrack; if 16-year-old me saw it, it would’ve easily displaced Face-Off as my all-time favorite movie at the time.  Drive turned me on to Refn’s other work and after getting through Bronson (impossibly weird) and the Pusher trilogy (varies from good to great), I was sufficiently excited for Only God Forgives.

Excitement pretty quickly melted into disappointment.  This is pretty oppressive throughout.  Gosling’s character has nothing going on upstairs.  His Drive character was all resolute, ultra-competent action.  He’s a passive, wet fart here, and therefore, completely uninteresting.  His mother, who was clearly a molester, has more going on, but it’s one note compared to no notes; be consistently awful.  She’s a cartoon villain and the movie’s not interested in developing her past a c-bomb dropping psychopath who compares her sons’ dick sizes.  The Thai detective was a welcome contrast, such that he deserved the win and he had the Driver’s cool, but he was still subject to Refn’s insane directing choices.

If Only God Forgives was filmed at normal speed, it would be shorter than an episode of Game of Thrones.  So many long hallways to walk down.  The color palette was so extreme that it had to mean something, though I couldn’t figure it out.  I tried keeping track of who was shot with a red filter versus a blue filter but I lost track.  I also lost the thread for any thematic connection.  Something this superficially arty has to have more on its mind than just revenge.  Maybe it was about women that shouldn’t be mothers?  Maybe the key was the statue the camera kept cutting to during the fight between Gosling and the detective?  Am I over-thinking it and giving Refn too much credit?  I also really disliked the ending scene in the detective’s home.  The detective’s daughter was put in danger only to manipulate the viewer.  Was there any doubt Gosling was going to kill his accomplice before the daughter was killed?  The nanny and the police guard can go fuck themselves, but a dramatic split-second decision to save a child?  Clearly, Gosling’s turned the corner!

There were enough things I liked to get it into the three-star, C range.  While not as uniformly strong a soundtrack as Drive, there were some strong tracks, particularly in the scene where the detective practices his swordplay.  The aforementioned fight had strong choreography, and the right people got their comeuppance/had their insides groped by their son for some reason.  I’ll be going into the next Refn film with more caution.  This had its handful of moments, but was a complete misstep.

What did everyone else thing?  Clearly, you loved it…
0 Comments

Warm bodies

2/1/2014

1 Comment

 

2.93
B

"I think the movie realizes how stupid its premise is, and is able to laugh at itself"
"Based on the movie's genre and concept it is virtually impossible to come out with a "great" movie."
"One thing I loved is how easily Dave Franco is forgotten about"
An “A” of any kind is out because I’ll never own it. B+ movies for me are really intriguing and I want to see them again. I wavered between B- and B for Warm Bodies, but settled on a B- because it was a pretty good movie, but was missing enough comedy or intrigue to get a B.


I went into Warm Bodies thinking it was going to be a spoof of some sorts. I’m still not sure if it was. The big selling points for me were the main character’s dialogue, the soundtrack, and some of the silly humor. The music was enjoyable and definitely filled in for the lack of dialogue well. The main character’s description of events and dry take on being a zombie was pretty funny - I chuckled a couple times. I can’t help but laugh at the easy stuff like playing catch with a zombie and the ball simply drills him or the two zombies grunting at each other at the bar.


I could have watched 90 minutes of over the top zombie comedy and come away more pleased. I think the film lost it’s way about 20 minutes in.


My biggest gripes with Warm Bodies are the following:
1) John Malcovich’s character is boring. Why did he even take that role?
2) I’m not sure if the chase scenes were trying to be intense or funny, but they seemed like filler to me.
3) The scene 2/3 of the way through where she stops in the burbs after being chased by zombies was terrible. Another one of those things were it’s like a zombie spoof, but not really because nothing bad happened. She was making relatively rational decisions (besides dating a zombie) until then.

Maybe I missed something or forgot some scene I really liked, but after this review I’m sticking with a B-.
1 Comment

    Authors

    JUST SOME IDIOTS GIVING SURPRISINGLY AVERAGE MOVIE REVIEWS.

    Categories

    All
    2017 Catch Up Trio
    80s
    Action
    Adventure
    AI Trio
    Author - Blair
    Author - Bobby
    Author - Bryan
    Author - Chris
    Author - Cook
    Author - Drew
    Author - Joe
    Author - Jon
    Author - JR
    Author - Lane
    Author - Phil
    Author - Pierce
    Author - Sean
    Author - Shane
    Author - Tom
    Best Of 2016
    Best Of 2017
    Best Of 2018
    Best Of 2019
    Best Of 2020
    Best Of 2021
    Best Of 2022
    Comedy
    Culture Clash Trio
    Denzel Trio
    Documentary
    Drama
    Foreign
    Historical
    Horror
    Internet Docs Trio
    Mediocrities
    Movie Trios
    Musical
    Podcast
    Romance
    Round 3.1
    Round 3.2
    Round 3.3
    Round 4.1
    Round 4.2
    Round 4.3
    Sci Fi
    Season 10
    Season 2
    Season 3
    Season 4
    Season 5
    Season 6
    Season 7
    Season 8
    Season 9
    Shorts
    Sports
    Thriller
    Western
    Women In Men's Worlds

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

    Click to set custom HTML